Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
706-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

706-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012355 50.866787)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012313 50.866782,-1.012315 50.866790,-1.012321 50.866798,-1.012330 50.866804,-1.012342 50.866808,-1.012355 50.866809,-1.012368 50.866808,-1.012380 50.866805,-1.012390 50.866799,-1.012396 50.866791,-1.012398 50.866783,-1.012396 50.866774,-1.012390 50.866767,-1.012381 50.866761,-1.012369 50.866757,-1.012356 50.866756,-1.012343 50.866757,-1.012331 50.866760,-1.012321 50.866766,-1.012315 50.866774,-1.012313 50.866782)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL